.NET Framework - What is the limit for memory a .NET process or AppDomain can use?

Asked By Max2006
04-Jun-08 06:49 PM
Hi,

What is the limit for memory that a .NET process or AppDomain can use?

Thank you,
Max
AppDomain
(1)
Max
(1)
GC
(1)
Online
(1)
Mudassar
(1)
Windows
(1)
Hassan
(1)
Arne
(1)
  arn replied...
04-Jun-08 08:25 PM
For 32 bit Windows ther eis a limit of 2 (or 3 if so configured) GB
of virtual memory (which is what .NET sees).

For 64 bit Windows the limit may not be the sky, but it is high - higher
than what you can use.

Arne
  Max2006 replied...
04-Jun-08 10:35 PM
Thank you Arne for help..

Could you refer me to msdn or online resource that explain this?

Thanks again,
Max
  arn replied...
04-Jun-08 10:43 PM
Google finds links like:

http://blogs.msdn.com/tom/archive/2008/04/10/chat-question-memory-limits-for-32-bit-and-64-bit-processes.aspx
http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=933856

Arne
  jeta replied...
05-Jun-08 01:38 AM
Hi Max,

Net AppDomain or Process does not have hard-coded memory limit in
principle. So the memory limit normally lies with the underlying OS memory
manager limitation. As Arne pointed out, the modern OS uses the virtual
memory management, so all the memory usage comes from the virtual memory
space instead of physical memory. For 32bit OS, 2^32 bytes(4GB) are
available to a process. However, since the OS kernel normally uses 2GB
virtual space. There are only 2GB left for the process user-mode code. So
we may believe that the memory limit for a .Net process/AppDomain is 2GB.

Can you tell me why you want to know of the memory limitation for .Net
process/AppDomain? In .Net world, the memory is abstracted as managed
objects. The .Net developers seldom touch or deal with memory directly
unless you are using unsafe code or p/invoke COM interop. Also, in the CLR,
the .Net GC is responsible for us to free the managed objects memory and
return to managed heap.

Do you allocate memory directly for native code? If we can understand your
purpose and problem context better, we may have a better solution. Thanks.

Best regards,
Jeffrey Tan
Microsoft Online Community Support

Delighting our customers is our #1 priority. We welcome your comments and
suggestions about how we can improve the support we provide to you. Please
feel free to let my manager know what you think of the level of service
provided. You can send feedback directly to my manager at:
msdnmg@microsoft.com.
==================================================
Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
ications.

Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
==================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
  mudassar.hassa replied...
06-Jun-08 12:45 AM
I agree with TAN, that there is no hardcoded memory limit, it depends on the
RAM size and the paging memory size.

--
Regards,
Mudassar Hassan
Software Engineer
http://mudassarhassan.spaces.live.com/
help
any strong reference to the images, the items are subject to be discarded by the GC. However, it might not happen at the time you expect it. The GC has to be triggered first. More specifically the generation 2 collector has to be invoked since cached objects often propagated to generation 2. Depending on the kind of GC you use, this might not happen unless the memory is required for something else. The recent .NET runtime has AFAIK 3 different GC implementations. Yes you can force the CG to run. But it is strongly recommended NOT to do so. You might easily confuse the GC, resulting in poor performance. The most critical point is if you invoke the generation 0 / 1 GC too frequently. This will force temporary objects to generation 2. using will not help very call Dispose at the end of the block. It does not free any memory. Marcel GC is not uniformly "better" or "worse". it is "different". However, it _does_ address a particularly perform better). Back in the 90's when .NET and C# were first showing up, GC was my primary objection to .NET. But back then, GC-based systems were slow and
System; using System.Text; using System.Threading; public class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { AppDomain domain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("SecondDomain"); Thread.CurrentThread.Name = "Thread 2"; / / / / Thread.Start in first domain Thread thread = new Current thread, for simpliicty, second domain / / / / The CrossAppDomainDelegate is a good tool for threading across appdomain / / / / boundaries. domain.DoCallBack(new CrossAppDomainDelegate(SomeMethod)); for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { Console.WriteLine 1000); } Console.ReadLine(); } static void SomeMethod() { int tal = 10; int sum = 10; Console.WriteLine("Domain: " + AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName); Console.WriteLine("Thread: " + System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.Name); Thread.Sleep(2000); tal = 0; sum = sum / tal; } } / / Tony C# Discussions CrossAppDomainDelegate (1) DoCallBack (1) AppDomain (1) Exception (1) Class (1) ExecuteAssembly (1) CreateDomain (1) Application (1) You execute the code why it is you a) think that the new thread is executing in the new AppDomain (it is not), and b) why you think that an exception in the new AppDomain will not propagate back up to the caller in the original AppDomain, thus stopping the application. Pete But as I have read somewhere it is one of
Unloading AppDomain won't release DLL handles .NET Framework Hi, I am trying to use an AppDomain to load an Assembly DLL that I can later unload (and release the lock on be that bare minimum I am looking for. . however, it does not work. When the AppDomain is unloaded, the handle to my Library.dll remains open - I can see this by running www.sysinternals.com's handle.exe after the AppDomain is unloaded. Can someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Thank you, Kind regards a possible solution / / to my problem, but it does not help / / ads.LoaderOptimization = LoaderOptimization.MultiDomainHost; AppDomain ad = AppDomain.CreateDomain("", null, ads); / / I am expecting this to load the library only into the / / AppDomain I just created Assembly a = ad.Load(File.ReadAllBytes("Library.dll")); / / Is this the correct e., it is not going to cause the Assembly to / / be loaded into the wrong AppDomain? / * IPlugin Plugin = (IPlugin)ad.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap ( a.FullName , "Problem.Library" ); Console.WriteLine(Plugin.Go("hi")); / / * / / / I
Lader einer Assembly in neue AppDomain .NET Framework Hallo zusammen. Ich habe eine AppDomain erstellt. In dieser m = F6chte ich nun eine Assembly laden. Dies funktioniert grunds = E4tzlich auch Aus diesem Grunde versuche ich, vor dem Laden der zu verwendenden Assembly in die neue AppDomain, die abh = E4ngige Assembly var ads = 3D new AppDomainSetup { ApplicationBase = 3D assemblyDirectory + " \ " + di.Name, DisallowBindingRedirects = 3D false, DisallowCodeDownload = 3D true, ConfigurationFile = 3D AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ConfigurationFile }; AppDomain pluginDomain = 3D AppDomain.CreateDomain("pp service plugin domain - " + name, null, ads); var bytes = 3D File.ReadAllBytes(path + "pp Herzlichen Dank f = FCr eure Hilfe. Viele Gr = FCsse, Thomas C# - German Discussions CreateInstanceAndUnwrap (1) AppDomain.CreateDomain (1) File.ReadAllBytes (1) AppDomainSetup (1) PluginDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap (1) CreateInstanceFrom (1) Assembly.LoadFrom (1 mit Assembly.LoadFrom(dateipfad)? Gruß Joachim - - Dr. Joachim Fuchs - Autor - Dozent - Softwarearchitekt http: / / www.fuechse-online.de / beruflich / index.html Hallo Joachim wie kriege ich die mit Assembly.LoadFrom() in meine
book that shows two assemblies in an Application Domain 2.There is a method in Appdomain that is named GetAssemblies that says "Gets the assemblies that have been loaded into the execution context of this application domain." static void Main(string[] args) { AppDomain myAppDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("New Domain"); myAppDomain.ExecuteAssemblyByName("AssemblyA"); myAppDomain.ExecuteAssemblyByName("AssemblyB"); myAppDomain.ExecuteAssemblyByName("AssemblyC"); } I have also if an Application Domain can have multiple assemblies or not ? / / Tony C# Discussions ExecuteAssemblyByName (1) AppDomain (1) ExecuteAssembly (1) GetAssemblies (1) CreateDomain (1) Application (1) LoadFrom (1) Thread (1) To better understand Application Domains, please remember that all .Net code ALWAYS executes in an AppDomain, even if you did not create any explicitly. For instance, if you create a plain and ordinary .exe application and you run it from Windows, a default appdomain will be created and your application will load into it. Can the AppDomain have multiple assemblies? Of course. That happens every time your .exe calls a .dll. You call Assembly.Load() or Assembly.LoadFrom(). These methods load a new assembly into the same AppDomain that calls them. You do not even need to load the assemlies from a different